instruction and feedback
LLF-Bench: Benchmark for Interactive Learning from Language Feedback
Cheng, Ching-An, Kolobov, Andrey, Misra, Dipendra, Nie, Allen, Swaminathan, Adith
We introduce a new benchmark, LLF-Bench (Learning from Language Feedback Benchmark; pronounced as "elf-bench"), to evaluate the ability of AI agents to interactively learn from natural language feedback and instructions. Learning from language feedback (LLF) is essential for people, largely because the rich information this feedback provides can help a learner avoid much of trial and error and thereby speed up the learning process. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently enabled AI agents to comprehend natural language -- and hence AI agents can potentially benefit from language feedback during learning like humans do. But existing interactive benchmarks do not assess this crucial capability: they either use numeric reward feedback or require no learning at all (only planning or information retrieval). LLF-Bench is designed to fill this omission. LLF-Bench is a diverse collection of sequential decision-making tasks that includes user recommendation, poem writing, navigation, and robot control. The objective of an agent is to interactively solve these tasks based on their natural-language instructions and the feedback received after taking actions. Crucially, to ensure that the agent actually "learns" from the feedback, LLF-Bench implements several randomization techniques (such as paraphrasing and environment randomization) to ensure that the task isn't familiar to the agent and that the agent is robust to various verbalizations. In addition, LLF-Bench provides a unified OpenAI Gym interface for all its tasks and allows the users to easily configure the information the feedback conveys (among suggestion, explanation, and instantaneous performance) to study how agents respond to different types of feedback. Together, these features make LLF-Bench a unique research platform for developing and testing LLF agents.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Research Report (0.50)
- Workflow (0.46)
- Education > Educational Setting > Online (0.50)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.89)
AI Teaches Brain Tumor Surgery Better Than Human Experts
Machine learning algorithms enhanced medical students' technical performance and learning outcomes during a simulated brain tumor surgery, a new study shows. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented both challenges and opportunities for medical training. Remote learning technology has become increasingly important in several fields. The new study finds that in a remote environment, an artificial intelligence (AI) tutoring system can outperform expert human instructors. The Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre at The Neuro at Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital recruited 70 medical students to perform virtual brain tumor removals on a neurosurgical simulator.
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (0.81)
- Education > Curriculum > Subject-Specific Education (0.80)
- Education > Educational Technology > Educational Software > Computer Based Training (0.45)
AI teaches brain tumor surgery better than human experts - Futurity
You are free to share this article under the Attribution 4.0 International license. Machine learning algorithms enhanced medical students' technical performance and learning outcomes during a simulated brain tumor surgery, a new study shows. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented both challenges and opportunities for medical training. Remote learning technology has become increasingly important in several fields. The new study finds that in a remote environment, an artificial intelligence (AI) tutoring system can outperform expert human instructors.
- Education > Curriculum > Subject-Specific Education (0.60)
- Education > Educational Technology > Educational Software > Computer Based Training (0.44)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (0.41)
Artificial Intelligence Tutoring Outperforms Expert Instructors in Brain Surgery Training
Machine learning algorithms enhanced technical performance and learning outcomes during simulated brain tumor removal. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented both challenges and opportunities for medical training. Remote learning technology has become increasingly important in several fields. A new study finds that in a remote environment, an artificial intelligence (AI) tutoring system can outperform expert human instructors. The Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre at The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital) recruited seventy medical students to perform virtual brain tumor removals on a neurosurgical simulator.
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (1.00)
- Education > Educational Technology > Educational Software > Computer Based Training (0.41)
Artificial intelligence tutoring outperforms expert instructors in neurosurgical training
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented both challenges and opportunities for medical training. Remote learning technology has become increasingly important in several fields. A new study finds that in a remote environment, an artificial intelligence (AI) tutoring system can outperform expert human instructors. The Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Center at The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital) recruited seventy medical students to perform virtual brain tumor removals on a neurosurgical simulator. Students were randomly assigned to receive instruction and feedback by either an AI tutor or a remote expert instructor, with a third control group receiving no instruction.
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (1.00)
- Education > Educational Technology > Educational Software > Computer Based Training (0.49)